Romney Defines A Good Competitor

-

I am for Obama; however, a recent ad about Bain is not going to do anything to get my vote. A business must make money if it is to survive. The purpose of a for profit corporation is to maximize the long-term net worth of its shareholders while abiding by all laws, rules and regulations. If that were not the objective, no one would invest in a corporation and therefore the corporation would not create jobs.

Capitalism and free markets are presently broken and need fixing. This does not mean the profit motive should be trashed. It means free markets and competition is the best way to create jobs. The problem is our markets are not free and industries are controlled by oligarchs.

When Romney was in Detroit this year campaigning he said of the Chinese, "They are good competitors, and like all good competitors, will take every advantage they can get. As long as we allow it, they will continue doing so." Was that his approach at Bain?

Capitalism was created to serve society. Society does not exist to serve capitalism. He has a twisted view of what a good competitor is and that is why we need stricter enforcement of anti-trust laws. More:  http://bit.ly/ff1202rc

Comments

  1. LarryJune 26, 2012 at 5:13 PM

    Why is it that so many people who claim to be capitalist are not upset about the oligarchs who are taking over the country?

    ReplyDelete
  2. gerAugust 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM

    Capitalism and Socialism must not be at odds. A mature and productive society needs both. The Socialist protagonist must invest his effort in convincing the Capitalist to willingly fund the minimum welfare state through taxes-- not charity (charity is the enemy of justice). The Capitalist protagonist must invest his effort in convincing the Socialist to avoid the moral hazard of generational dependency and destruction of entrepreneurship. There must be a constructive balance of the two--call it Democratic Social Capitalism--and,then, let this constructive polarity bring us to--

    Inarguably, the ultimate goal of a fair and equitable society, is to provide that, the son or daughter of poor or middle class parent(s) has an opportunity at upward mobility equal to a son or daughter of rich parent(s). Therefore, the taxation structure--income and all other taxes, fees--must provide for a) access to good nutrition, b) access to adequate housing, c) access to quality health care and d) equal access to education and advanced education. Taking advantage of this equality, however is, then, up to the individual.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gerAugust 5, 2012 at 2:04 PM

    Capitalism and Socialism must not be at odds. A mature and productive society needs both. The Socialist protagonist must invest his effort in convincing the Capitalist to willingly fund the minimum welfare state through taxes-- not charity (charity is the enemy of justice). The Capitalist protagonist must invest his effort in convincing the Socialist to avoid the moral hazard of generational dependency and destruction of entrepreneurship. There must be a constructive balance of the two--call it Democratic Social Capitalism--and,then, let this constructive polarity bring us to--

    Inarguably, the ultimate goal of a fair and equitable society, is to provide that, the son or daughter of poor or middle class parent(s) has an opportunity at upward mobility equal to a son or daughter of rich parent(s). Therefore, the taxation structure--income and all other taxes, fees--must provide for a) access to good nutrition, b) access to adequate housing, c) access to quality health care and d) equal access to education and advanced education. Taking advantage of this equality, however is, then, up to the individual.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Freedom on The Internet!

-
Image
Net neutrality under attack:   Don't let Verizon and Google dictate the future of the Internet. Contact the FCC! This post reflects a comment received from Common Cause. It is time to stand up with them and keep the internet free . As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers how to write the rules to protect freedom and openness on the Internet,   who should they turn to: consumers like you and me, or the oligopolistic telecommunications companies?   Verizon and Google announced this week that they have it all figured out when it comes to net neutrality.* They unveiled a policy framework that would give telecom companies the right to speed up or slow down certain kinds of content, and to block outright  applications or content on wireless networks.
Read More

What Can Free Market Conservatives Do?

-
I am a free market conservative. I voted republican in every presidential election since 1968, except one. It is obvious that our government must live within its means and do so in a manner as not to interfere with a functioning free market economy. If we desire to take control of government, we must demand government carry out one of its primary functions; protecting free markets from tyranny, both public and private. We are vocal about defending it from public tyranny, but silent when it comes to tyranny in the private sector. “Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficial. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Justice Louis Brandeis 1928 Today our focus seems to be only on the tyranny of government when it comes to free markets. We need t
Read More

China And The Five Baits

-
Image
If you are under the age of 50 you should be concerned about China from an economic and global power standpoint. Some believe China is seeking peace with the rest of the world. Based on their long history, I am not convinced. For China long term is hundreds of years and for the United States it is the next election cycle. China's focus is always on the long term. Much of this post is drawn from a book,  On China , written by Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State under President Nixon and a research paper of the National Intelligence Council titled  Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds . Whether the future will prove China's desire for peaceful co-existence depends on whether its middle class will sufficiently benefit from economic growth and not allow their leadership to throw it away by creating enemies with trading partners.  This requires the country becoming more democratic and less inclined to be a threat to the remainder of the world.  The jury is still looking
Read More