Right to Life Vs. Right to VP

Ryan appears to have borrowed Romney's Etch-A-Sketch.

Per news reports Romney believes abortion should be legal in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother’s life is in danger. Ryan's position is all abortions, except if the mother's life is in danger, should be illegal.

Paul Ryan believes that getting an abortion is taking of a human life and is wrong. Ryan has effectively stated that he will overlook the taking of "innocent lives" because his running mate has deemed it to be OK and Romney is after all the head of the Republican ticket.

How can Ryan remain part of a ticket if it is going against one of his core beliefs? If he is not willing to take a stance on "life" on what other core beliefs is he willing to sacrifice to become Vice President?


  1. Can it possibly be that Mr. Ryan is first and foremost a politician and not the "devout" Catholic he's been posing as? Or has he salved his conscience and will hide from his record in order to get elected because he then can do the country so much good by unveiling his deeply held pro-life position.

  2. He then is even a bigger hypocrite. Playing with life is about as serious as you can get. If you cave in on this subject it means you will cave on just about anything.

  3. Another bought and paid for politician.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Freedom on The Internet!

What Can Free Market Conservatives Do?

China And The Five Baits