What To Do With Labor

-

The functions of a union in a "free market" economy is a difficult thing to rationalize. In such an economy there is suppose to be many producers serving many consumers with the result that the consumer gets the best products at the lowest prices possible. If a producer does not compete he fails.

The theory is on solid footing in a free market; however, it breaks down if the market instead is controlled by an oligopoly or monopoly. In this instance, the producer no longer cares as much about the wants and needs of the consumer. He will produce the cheapest product possible and charge the highest price because the consumer has no choice.

In the perfect world, labor will deliver their product, their labor, to the producer under the guidance of a free market system. The problem is we do not have a free market when it comes to labor. Usually one union represents labor at one company and often within one industry. Therefore, labor has the opportunity to "extort" wages and benefits that are potentially much higher than a free market would allow. In a global economy this results in goods coming from a foreign country to be cheaper than what is produced within the United States.

No one has come up with a solution to this problem, including myself. Perhaps we need to treat labor in the same manner as utilities. We have accepted the fact that our electricity providers in this country need to be of such a size that it does not permit more than one company to be able to provide electricity to large regions of the country. Further, the cost to be a provider of electricity is so costly that it limits who can enter the business. As a result, we have deemed them to be a utility and must be regulated so their influence and power is not abused.

Is this what we must do with labor?

Comments

  1. Brenda H.July 5, 2012 at 9:01 AM

    Wow! First time I heard it said in this manner. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  2. George P.July 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM

    I assume you will be moving out of Michigan with these comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJuly 5, 2012 at 11:35 PM

    Where to even start . . .

    So, the problem with our economy is that those pesky worker bees can band together and negotiate for wages that would otherwise be lower? And those poor bosses have no recourse but to fork over the money. Which is why, of course, executive compensation is at all time lows . . . doh, except that it's not! Hmmm . . .

    In a truly free market there would be no laws restricting what labor could do, actually, just as there would be no patents (which allow pharmaceutical companies to charge Americans 8 - 10 times what Europeans pay for prescription drugs) nor copyrights.

    Treat labor like utilities? Hell, why be so progressive?

    Why not return to the days of serfs? Give people just enough to eek out short, miserable lives. Yeah, isn't that what the Founding Fathers meant by the pursuit of survival? Oh, crap again, I got that wrong . . . what was it they wrote?

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJuly 19, 2012 at 5:22 PM

    Ken
    The problem is not that the worker bees negotiate for better wages, its that they threaten to shut down and bankrupt companies if they don't get wages beyond what the skill the offer is worth

    Most automobile assembly line jobs take from 1 to 5 days to learn, about the same time as a fast food server, but pay middle class wages that otherwise would require 2 years in a trade school or 4 years in a college to be able to earn

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Freedom on The Internet!

-
Image
Net neutrality under attack:   Don't let Verizon and Google dictate the future of the Internet. Contact the FCC! This post reflects a comment received from Common Cause. It is time to stand up with them and keep the internet free . As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers how to write the rules to protect freedom and openness on the Internet,   who should they turn to: consumers like you and me, or the oligopolistic telecommunications companies?   Verizon and Google announced this week that they have it all figured out when it comes to net neutrality.* They unveiled a policy framework that would give telecom companies the right to speed up or slow down certain kinds of content, and to block outright  applications or content on wireless networks.
Read More

What Can Free Market Conservatives Do?

-
I am a free market conservative. I voted republican in every presidential election since 1968, except one. It is obvious that our government must live within its means and do so in a manner as not to interfere with a functioning free market economy. If we desire to take control of government, we must demand government carry out one of its primary functions; protecting free markets from tyranny, both public and private. We are vocal about defending it from public tyranny, but silent when it comes to tyranny in the private sector. “Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficial. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Justice Louis Brandeis 1928 Today our focus seems to be only on the tyranny of government when it comes to free markets. We need t
Read More

China And The Five Baits

-
Image
If you are under the age of 50 you should be concerned about China from an economic and global power standpoint. Some believe China is seeking peace with the rest of the world. Based on their long history, I am not convinced. For China long term is hundreds of years and for the United States it is the next election cycle. China's focus is always on the long term. Much of this post is drawn from a book,  On China , written by Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State under President Nixon and a research paper of the National Intelligence Council titled  Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds . Whether the future will prove China's desire for peaceful co-existence depends on whether its middle class will sufficiently benefit from economic growth and not allow their leadership to throw it away by creating enemies with trading partners.  This requires the country becoming more democratic and less inclined to be a threat to the remainder of the world.  The jury is still looking
Read More