A CEO's Decision!

-
If you were the CEO of a large, very profitable, cash plush, corporation employing thousands of workers, which of the two scenarios below would encourage you to hire more employees.

Scenario one: Congress enacts a new bill lowering your personal and corporate income taxes

Scenario two: Congress enacts a bill to spend money to repair the nations infrastructure and education. Under this scenario your advisers believe that the demand for the products you produce will increase and therefore, so should your sales and profits.

Remember, when making your choice, the question is which alternative is most likely to cause you to add to the number of workers you employ.

Scenario one represents what the Republicans are advocating and scenerio two represents the plan favored by most Democrats.

Comments

  1. Scott BNovember 21, 2011 at 10:06 AM

    Too restrictive of a question without enough details. There's no real discussion to be had with what's laid out here.

    It depends on the industry, but why would I want to hire Americans when I have unrestricted access to Indonesians, Egyptian, etc workers at a fraction of the cost? So improving US infrastructure will have far less of an effect until that problem is resolved.

    Also, if I'm a CEO, I'm not looking for the scenario that would cause me to hire new workers years from now. I want my corporation's numbers to look as good as possible next few quarters. Scenario one does that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM

    Valid points! However, the answer to the question is the stimulus creates more jobs. Lowering taxes does not do that. It may increase the net worth of company and CEO, but it does nothing for jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousNovember 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM

    Well sir, the question is, what would you do? And I think you know the answer.

    Any rational CEO would pick #2. Sure, lowering taxes is always welcome, but it does virtually nothing to incentivize hiring more employees. Let's face it, new employees without (the prospect of) new customers is just wasted money. That's why many firms are sitting on piles of cash at the moment.

    And that, sir, is (one of the reasons) why the Republican party of today is hopelessly wrong. And in your heart of hearts you know it!

    (by BruceS - I tried logging in with Google but it didn't work)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Freedom on The Internet!

-
Image
Net neutrality under attack:   Don't let Verizon and Google dictate the future of the Internet. Contact the FCC! This post reflects a comment received from Common Cause. It is time to stand up with them and keep the internet free . As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers how to write the rules to protect freedom and openness on the Internet,   who should they turn to: consumers like you and me, or the oligopolistic telecommunications companies?   Verizon and Google announced this week that they have it all figured out when it comes to net neutrality.* They unveiled a policy framework that would give telecom companies the right to speed up or slow down certain kinds of content, and to block outright  applications or content on wireless networks.
Read More

What Can Free Market Conservatives Do?

-
I am a free market conservative. I voted republican in every presidential election since 1968, except one. It is obvious that our government must live within its means and do so in a manner as not to interfere with a functioning free market economy. If we desire to take control of government, we must demand government carry out one of its primary functions; protecting free markets from tyranny, both public and private. We are vocal about defending it from public tyranny, but silent when it comes to tyranny in the private sector. “Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficial. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Justice Louis Brandeis 1928 Today our focus seems to be only on the tyranny of government when it comes to free markets. We need t
Read More

China And The Five Baits

-
Image
If you are under the age of 50 you should be concerned about China from an economic and global power standpoint. Some believe China is seeking peace with the rest of the world. Based on their long history, I am not convinced. For China long term is hundreds of years and for the United States it is the next election cycle. China's focus is always on the long term. Much of this post is drawn from a book,  On China , written by Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State under President Nixon and a research paper of the National Intelligence Council titled  Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds . Whether the future will prove China's desire for peaceful co-existence depends on whether its middle class will sufficiently benefit from economic growth and not allow their leadership to throw it away by creating enemies with trading partners.  This requires the country becoming more democratic and less inclined to be a threat to the remainder of the world.  The jury is still looking
Read More