Open Letter to The Tea Party

-
"Millions of dollars have flowed in from corporations and rich donors, all of whom have their own ideas about what the tea party should be. This struggle for the soul of the movement has left many of its original activists facing agonizing decisions: Do they, should they, still belong?" Washington Post 12/31/10

The Tea Party claims to be pro business and anti big bureaucracy, including big government. It believes that government stifles entrepreneurship and destroys creativity of its citizens. There is too much power centralized in government and thus diminishes the power and freedom of our citizens.

I agree with much of what the Tea Party stands for. Indeed there is too much power and decision making going on in Washington. Our resources are being squandered and  the ability of  individuals to be free to choose is being slowly eroded. One of the basic rights of being a citizen is the right to choose  your associates and where and with whom you will conduct business with, including the right to access free markets.Why is the Tea Party not up in "arms" defending our free markets?

 Why are they not quoting Justice Louis Brandeis when he said in 1928:

“Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficial. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”

As a citizen you have a right to expect that the free market system will provide a multitude of alternatives  relative to price, quality, and features that are available to you .

Private markets and free enterprise is what The Tea Party stands for. So why are they not up in arms demanding that our government defend us against the tyranny of the oligopolies that are controlling our free markets? It happened in the auto industry, the health care industry, the banking industry, wall street and others.

A major reason why our politicians in Washington are doing nothing about it is the egregious campaign contributions made by members of these oligopolies including Goldman Sachs and Bank of America. Could it be that the Tea Party has also been bought off by big business?

Is there a circle of corruption going on between the oligopolies and our government officials?  Oligopolies have taken control of many of our markets and government looks the other way because of the campaign contributions, some call it bribes, made by the oligopolies to our elected officials. Is the Tea Party becoming a part of this circle.

I hope not; however, show me some action on the front to protect our free markets from tyranny within.

Comments

  1. paboeseJanuary 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM

    Yes, the Tea Party is indeed becoming part of the big business and government cycle of corruption. Many say the Tea Party was established by the wealth of some of these oligarchs like the Koch brothers. Perhaps the Republicans were afraid the common (non-rich) Republican voter was catching on to their pro-rich agenda. Now that Tea Party representatives are in office in Washington, isn't it to be expected that they will learn to participate in the gravy train the others follow? It will indeed be telling whether any TP folks speak out against the tyranny of the megacorporations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. JimboAugust 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM

    There seems to be a very strange but persistent notion that the Republican Party and its new, extremist fringe, the Tea Party are all about free enterprise and small business. Since its inception in 1856, the GOP has always been about supporting the big business establishment and all during the late 19th and 20the century it supported large trusts and monopolies and laws that favored large businesses. This has continued and greatly expanded in this new century. Yes, there has been a lot of rhetoric about freedom and copious tears about small business but actions speak far louder than words.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mike BAugust 1, 2012 at 10:32 AM

    Great comment Jimbo; however, there was a time, before 1980 where the Republicans were honorable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

China And The Five Baits

-
Image
If you are under the age of 50 you should be concerned about China from an economic and global power standpoint. Some believe China is seeking peace with the rest of the world. Based on their long history, I am not convinced. For China long term is hundreds of years and for the United States it is the next election cycle. China's focus is always on the long term. Much of this post is drawn from a book,  On China , written by Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State under President Nixon and a research paper of the National Intelligence Council titled  Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds . Whether the future will prove China's desire for peaceful co-existence depends on whether its middle class will sufficiently benefit from economic growth and not allow their leadership to throw it away by creating enemies with trading partners.  This requires the country becoming more democratic and less inclined to be a threat to the remainder of the world.  The jury is still looking
Read More

Keep Freedom on The Internet!

-
Image
Net neutrality under attack:   Don't let Verizon and Google dictate the future of the Internet. Contact the FCC! This post reflects a comment received from Common Cause. It is time to stand up with them and keep the internet free . As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers how to write the rules to protect freedom and openness on the Internet,   who should they turn to: consumers like you and me, or the oligopolistic telecommunications companies?   Verizon and Google announced this week that they have it all figured out when it comes to net neutrality.* They unveiled a policy framework that would give telecom companies the right to speed up or slow down certain kinds of content, and to block outright  applications or content on wireless networks.
Read More

Save Some Art or Save Detroit

-
Image
  This is something I wrote back in 2014 while Detroit was struggling with a bankruptcy. I profess not to know the value of all the art held at the Detroit Institute of Art (DIA). Further, I do not know how much of the art is owned by the city of Detroit. I think we should find out and use it in the best way possible to save Detroit and its citizens. I  commend all the foundations and the state of Michigan who have stepped up with hundreds of millions of dollars in proposed contributions to save the DIA and the art work that it holds. Is the plan presented to the creditors concerning these donations and the leveraging of the art the best way to save Detroit and its citizens? Is saving the artwork more important than saving the city and its citizens? Stephen Henderson of the Detroit Free Press made a valid point with his editorial titled “ Detroit’s Rebirth Must Include More Than Downtown, Midtown “. Detroit will not succeed  if it does not cultivate a middle class and we cannot wait de
Read More